THE OBENSON REPORT

Covering Cinema From All Across The African Diaspora

Thandie Newton, Idris Elba In 'RocknRolla'

Guy Ritchie makes another film about London's criminal underbelly. Nothing major right? Right. The only reason (or reasons) I'm posting this is because 2 of London's finest, Thandie Newton and Idris Elba, co-star in the film, which stars Gerard Butler as a character who calls himself One Two, a mobster with street smarts.

The film's premise is listed as follows: when a Russian mobster sets up a real estate scam that generates millions of pounds, various members of London's criminal underworld pursue their share of the fortune.

Thandie Newton plays Stella, an accountant who is One Two's (Gerard Butler's) love interest. Idris Elba's character is called Mumbles, and he is One-Two's partner - essentially his black sidekick. So he's got a black love interest and a black sidekick. I wonder if Mumbles has ever thought about taking One-Two out, and snagging Stella in the process. Probably not... although, who knows, maybe there's a plot twist in there that follows that storyline. Shhhh... don't tell anybody :o)

By the way, is it just me or does there seem to be quite a proliferation of recent films (moreso than ever before) with white male leads who have black love interests?

The film also co-stars Ludacris, as Roman, an American musician seeking to break through in London - a role that I'm sure he eased right into.

RocknRolla hits theatres October 3rd.

Here are a couple of images from the film featuring both Thandie and Idris. Click each one for an enlarged view:

L.A. Film Festival Dispatch - 'Prince of Broadway' Review

I'm not in L.A. to attend the L.A. Film Festival, but I'll certainly be paying attention to the blogs of those that will be present, in search of coverage on any African Diasporic content, like Matt Dentler's blog which is part of the indieWIRE Blog Network.

Matt saw Prince of Broadway yesterday, Monday, a film I posted an entry on which you can read HERE. Here's what he had to say about it... it's not what I would call a thorough review, but there's enough there to chew on for now:

On Monday, I caught Sean Baker's third feature, Prince of Broadway, having its world premiere in the strong LAFF Narrative Competition. Baker's film follows a Manhattan counterfeit hustler named Lucky, who makes ends meet by selling imitation sneakers and handbags. One day, an old girlfriend drops an 18-month-old baby in his hands, claiming it's his son and that he must take care of him now. More than just a remodeled version of Baby Boom, Baker's film explores issues of class and race in modern America. Prince Adu (a non-professional first-timer) delivers a great performance as Lucky, an African native living illegally in New York. And, Baker captures the intensity and irreverence of the circumstances with equal parts sadness and humor. It's a tough balance, and a concept that could have easily failed. Instead, Prince of Broadway is an indie must-see.

Check out Matt's blog HERE. No word yet on distribution.

Film Recommendation - Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take One

An experiment.

It is 1968; director William Greaves and his student crew are in New York's Central Park filming a screen test. The drama involves a bitter break-up between a married couple. But this is just the "cover story." The real story is happening "off" camera as the enigmatic director pursues some hidden agenda, leading to growing conflict and chaos amongst the students, which explodes on screen producing a brilliant kind of raw energy and insight.

This cinema verite film-within-a-film can't be easily defined. But it's one of the most innovative movies about making movies. It generated 1 sequel titled Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take 2 1/2, released 37 years later

Check it out on a 2-disc feature-packed DVD set HERE.

Learn more about William Greaves HERE and be sure to take a look at his other many works, mostly documentaries.

Here's the trailer:

Will Smith Wants To Be A Bollywood Star

An addendum to my 2 earlier Bollywood posts today... I just came across this on Australia's TheWest.com.au website:

Hancock actor Will Smith who has made his name by landing lead roles in a series of big blockbuster action movies – thinks it is time to try his hand at a different genre.

He said: “I’ve made a couple of speculative deals in India. We’ve got some "Bolly-Will" movies going on!”


Will also dismissed claims he is planning to make a follow-up to his hit movies ‘Bad Boys’ and Bad Boys 2... “I probably won’t do that. There have been pitches, and the concept is genius for Bad Boys 3
but I’ve moved on now.”

It was recently reported Will had begged director Michael Bay to let him reprise his role for a third time because his son is such a big fan of the movies.


More
HERE.

Ya know, unlike Stallone and Schwarzenegger, I can actually see Will full on in a Bollywood movie, singing and dancing and everything :o)

The Fat Lady Is Warming Up - Death Of The Newspaper?

As I read this article, I tried to recollect when I last bought an actual newspaper, and I realized that it's been awhile. The same goes for magazines, although I'm more likely to invest in a mag.

With so much of the same content available on the web for free in most cases, and readily accessible, why would I? Frankly, why would anyone? I suppose, maybe those few people who are allergic to technology, or those who I've heard say that they love the feel of the paper in their palms, the smell of the ink, and the ritualistic habit of sitting in a comfortable lounge chair and flipping through the pages on a Sunday morning, while eating breakfast. How romantic :o)

Maybe it's a generational thing. Maybe the rest of us need to spend less time on our computers and relive the golden days, pre-web, 15 to 20 years ago, when stalwart periodicals with names that often ended with words like "Times," "Inquirer" and "Post" dominated the flow of news content from source to reader.

Nah! Not going to happen! Those days are long gone. The days of the
Gray lady's dominance are numbered, even if Rupert Murdoch eventually makes a play for her, which he's said he wouldn't; but after gobbling up the Wall Street Journal, why not the New York Times as well?

With the rise of independent upstarts like
The Huffington Post (there goes that word "Post" again) and The Drudge Report (disclaimer: I use "Report" in my blog title as well), and many, many, MANY others of varying sizes, the decline in newspaper readership should be of no surprise. In fact, I remember hearing several voices years ago, predicting this shift from the real to the virtual world. It's the 21st century capitalist's battleground. There's gold in them there mountains, so, get out your shovels and start digging, because the playing field has been leveled in this new territory (as long as Net Neutrality isn't blasted to bits). Anyone... and I mean anyone can win and win big. Just ask the likes of Variety Magazine and The Hollywood Reporter about the war that's being waged against them by the smaller independent film news sites.

So, when I read articles like this one below from the Gray Lady herself - her online version - I simply nod, shrug and grin. What else can I do.

From the
NY Times

Papers Facing Worst Year for Ad Revenue

For newspapers, the news has swiftly gone from bad to worse. This year is taking shape as their worst on record, with a double-digit drop in advertising revenue, raising serious questions about the survival of some papers and the solvency of their parent companies.


Read the whole story HERE.

Monday Funnies - McCain And Obama, BFF!

The cover of this week's issue of New York Magazine - their so-called "Summer Issue." I think the image speaks for itself! If it says nothing to you, start off by Googling "terrorist fist jab" and go on from there :o) Of course the image says so much more, but that's probably the first thing most will notice.

Trailer - The Secret Life Of Bees (Latifah, J-Hud, Okonedo, Keys)

Here it is, the first teaser clip for Gina Prince Bythewood's latest since Love and Basketball, titled, The Secret Life of Bees, based on the critically acclaimed 2002 bestselling novel by Sue Monk Kidd, which stars an interesting combo of actresses including, Queen Latifah, Jennifer Hudson, Sophie Okonedo, and Alicia Keys.

Although Dakota Fanning is the star of the film, which is set in South Carolina in 1964, and tells the tale of Lily Owens (Fanning) a 14 year-old girl who is haunted by the memory of her late mother. To escape her lonely life and troubled relationship with her father (played by Paul Bettany), Lily flees with Rosaleen (Hudson), her caregiver and only friend, to a South Carolina town that holds the secret to her mother's past. Taken in by the intelligent and independent Boatwright sisters (Latifah, Okonedo and Keys), Lily finds solace in their mesmerizing world of beekeeping, honey and the Black Madonna.

Never read the book, so I have no idea what to expect here. But based on the synopsis alone, I can't help but get the proverbial "magical, mystical Negro" air from it, considering it's set in the early 60s, accompanied by sentences like "Lily finds solace in their mesmerizing world." It sounds like yet another Legend of Bagger Vance-type of story - a supporting mystical black stock character(s) who, by use of special insight or other kind of "power," helps the white protagonist get over some personal struggle.

I can only hope that with a director who is black and female, we'll get an atypical representation. The film is scheduled for an October 17 release. Thoughts?


ATTN: New York - Sneak Peak At ‘Hancock’ Tomorrow

Well... something like that. Read on...

From MTV Movies Blog posted by Josh Horowitz:

If you’re in the New York City area, we’d like to cordially invite you to a FREE event with “Hancock” star Jason Bateman. I’m going to be moderating a Q&A with the star at the Sony Style Store at 550 Madison Avenue on Tuesday, June 24th at 6 p.m.

It’s not a huge venue, and seating is first come, first served, so get there early.

Jason is going to answer all of my AND YOUR questions, plus we’ll take a sneak peek together at “Hancock” (yes, some cool clips will be shown!). Sound good? Of course it does. So come on out...!

Uhura Speaks About Avatar

Found this interview that Zoe Saldana did recently with io9.com in which she talks about her upcoming turn as Lieutenant Commander Uhura in the JJ Abrams directed Star Trek movie (a role most of us will likely always remember the divine Nichelle Nichols for), and her role in what will likely be the biggest film of her career up until its release, anyway - of course I'm talking about her starring performance in James Cameron's ambitious, by all acounts, 3-D science fiction film, Avatar - a project 13 years in the making and a whopping $200 Million budget!!

As both films won't be released until next year (Star Trek in May and Avatar in December) she doesn't give a lot of details about what we can expect in each project. But she does talk about meeting the original Uhura, conversations they shared, the rumors that the skirts in this new Star Trek are shorter than those in the original show, the intense six-month physical prep she had to endure for Avatar, working with James Cameron, and when we can expect to see a trailer for it, and a few other somewhat frivolous items :o)

I'm really looking forward to both films (not because of Zoe, mind you; the names behind the camera are the draw), so anything that shows up on my radar with regard to either of project will likely get posted on this blog. JJ Abrams the wunderkind creator of TV's Lost, and the dizzying yet captivating Cloverfield has recently gotten attention. James Cameron's resume is chuck-full of solid blockbuster movies - Aliens, Terminator 1 & 2, True Lies, and of course Titanic, still the highest grossing film of all time, amongst others.

However, I think we can all agree that 2009 will be a big year for Zoe Saldana! The decisions she makes immediately after working with 2 of the more respected directors in the biz will certainly be crucial for career longetivity.

You can read the entire interview HERE.

Flashback - the kiss that stopped the world:

And Speaking Of Bollywood...

I realize that I've posted quite a few entries on the fledgling Bollywood/Hollywood alliance... but with good reason. It's all very fascinating to me, and the long term ramifications (whether positive or negative) are still somewhat of a mystery to me, which keeps me all the more intrigued as each story develops. And recognize that India is a country that's roughly 50 years removed from British colonial rule, asserting a kind of power that many other once-colonized nations are far from being able to wield.

The New York Times is also taking notice, and today printed a 2-page editorial on the subject titled Bollywood Goes to Hollywood, Seeking Bargains, which you can read in its entirety HERE.

Bollywood "Invasion" Continues - Stallone, Schwarzenegger In Bollywood Film

If you've been reading this blog, you've surely read the 2 entries I've posted on Bollywood's aggressive partnerships with Hollywood talent and executives. If you haven't, feel free to catch up HERE and HERE.

Aside from the Spielberg/Reliance $500 Million deal which hasn't been solidified yet, but looks like it will be, we're starting to see some fruits of this so-called Bollywood "invasion."

From Times UK:

Sylvester Stallone is to become the first well-known Hollywood actor to star in a Bollywood movie... Arnold Schwarzenegger will also feature in the production.

The two will appear alongside Bollywood stars Ashkay Kumar and Kareena Kapoor in a film called Incredible Love, the story of an Indian stuntman who takes Hollywood by storm but cannot find true love there (hmmm... ok).

The film will be the first Indian production to be shot at Hollywood’s Universal Studios and will have the highest budget in Bollywood history: more than £11m (about $22 Million).

Sajid Nadiadwala, the producer, said his success in landing Stallone and Schwarzenegger reflected the growing power of the Indian film market and Bollywood’s increasing cooperation with Hollywood studios that are keen to cut costs.


My guess is that the appearance of Stallone and Schwarzenegger will amount to nothing more than brief cameos. I can't see either of them getting involved in anything much more than that. But, I could be surprised! We'll see, I guess.

Other Hollywood stars who have recently signed agreements with Indian entertainment companies include Tom Hanks, George Clooney, Brad Pitt and Nicolas Cage. So, expect to see a lot more cross-continental productions.

However, as the article suggests, Bollywood would likely come out of these agreements the bigger winner as "India would remain a difficult market for Hollywood to crack..." since they "have too strong a film culture" already over there.

Read it all HERE.

Will.I.Am Reveals Details About His Big-Screen Debut In 'X-Men Origins: Wolverine'

"I'm a teleporter. ... I'm here, I'm there, I'm everywhere. Boom, boom, boom!" Will revealed. "My character's name is John Wraith. He's a black Texan. He's not a cowboy, but his gear suggests that he is. He's just a badass who'll whoop your ass."

Ok William!

Check out my "Mutated Black Eyed Pea" post for back-story if you need it. The image on the left is what Wraith is supposed to look like. Interestingly, I could find only 2 images of the character on the web. Why?

Hugh Jackman of course stars as the titular Wolverine which is directed by Gavin Hood, the same dude who brought us the South African film, Tsotsi (didn't care for it).

Two videos in one below:

Box Office June 20 - June 22, 2008

Top 10 box office results for this weekend, June 20th - June 22nd.

Once again, nothing terribly exciting to report. Get Smart was number 1 as expected, pulling in half its budget. Kung Fu Panda continues to do quite well, with a cumulative box office total of over $155 Million - keep in mind that it cost $150 Million to make, and that number doesn't include marketing. So, while $155 Million might seem extraordinary, the film has yet to actually make a profit. It's incredible! These films just keep getting more and more expensive - likely surpassing the rate of inflation. I remember 1990/91, when Terminator 2 was in production, at a budget of $100 Million, which at the time was unheard of, making it the most expensive film ever made up until that point! There was so much hoopla surrounding it's production and eventual release. Will it make a profit? Will it even make its budget back? Etc, etc, etc. Luckily it satisfied both concerns. 17 or so years later, a $100 Million budget for a film is more common than ever. This weekend alone, 4 of the top 10 box office flicks have budgets of OVER $100 Million. Only 1 film on the list has a budget of less than $60 Million - again, these numbers don't include marketing costs, so you can easily add another 25% of each number to itself to get the real numbers. If we took marketing into consideration, 6 out of 10 would be at least $100 Million.

Will the bubble burst eventually, or can we soon expect to start seeing $250 to $300 Million budgets? Damn!

Not-so surprisingly, The Incredible Hulk and The Happening (the top 2 films last week) both dropped more than 60% of their box office totals from last week, with The Happening dropping almost 70% (67.2% exactly). Both are large drops from week 1 to week 2, which tells us that word of mouth on each film from last week to this week was mostly negative. I saw both films and was underwhelmed each time... even downright disappointed, and a little annoyed by both. Each will likely turn a profit in the long run, thanks to international box office returns, although I think Hulk is a much easier sell to foreign markets than The Happening. Regardless, given the overwhelmingly negative critical response to Happening, it'll be interesting to see where Shyamalan's career goes from here. I think he'll find much more resistance from studios.

Sex and the City continues to do well, making over $132 Million thus far, on a $65 Million budget. Even with marketing costs added in, the film has already made a profit, and will likely do very well when it gets to the home video market. I think DVD sales will be strong, even though many of the reviews I've heard/read about the film have been average of less than.

Opening this week, WALL-E (Wide), Wanted (Wide), Finding Amanda (Limited), Gunnin' For That #1 Spot (Limited) and Trumbo (Limited). I might actually see WALL-E (I'm a long-time Pixar fan) and Wanted.

Here are this weekend's results:

1 Get Smart $39,155,000 ($39,155,000) $80
2 Kung Fu Panda $21,700,000 ($155,596,000) $130
3 The Incredible Hulk $21,557,000 $96,476,000 $150
2 N The Love Guru $14,000,000 ($14,000,000) $62
5 The Happening $10,000,000 ($50,267,000) $60
6 Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull $8,414,000 ($290,835,000) $185
7 You Don't Mess with the Zohan $7,200,000 ($84,055,000) $90
8 Sex and the City $6,465,000 ($132,385,000) $65
9 Iron Man $4,002,000 ($304,788,000) $140
10 The Strangers $1,949,000 ($49,586,000) $9

The Chinese Are Coming! The Chinese Are Coming!

Well, actually, they're already there, and have been there for a few years now, and it looks like they're going to be there for awhile. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, start HERE before continuing.

China plans to construct railway across Sub-Saharan Africa

Dar es Salaam, Tanzania - Plans are under way for the Chinese to construct a railway line cutting across Sub-Saharan Africa from Angola on the western seaboard to Tanzania on the eastern coast of the continent, sources say here Saturday.

According to Dr. Martyn Davies, an expert on China and Africa relations of Stellenbosch University in South Africa, with the Chinese economy’s growth firmly hinged on Africa’s natural resources, the need to easily move commodities from the continent will spawn massive infrastructure initiatives by the Chinese.

’’The railway line, which will run from Luanda to Dar-es-Salaam will reduce the relevance of Durban and Mombasa as key landing ports for traders from the east,’’ says Dr Davies...

... In addition, the China International Fund Ltd based in Hong Kong is undertaking a $300 million rehabilitation of the Benguela railway line in Angola, which was destroyed during the civil war.

Read the entire article HERE.

Where The Hell Is Matt?

This always puts a smile on my face. Where's my damn passport?!!?

This is the first viral video of designer Matt Harding, who travelled to various places in the world and shot footage of himself and others dancing in each locale he visited. This was 2005 I believe. Since then, he's made two more, which have also gone on to become huge viral hits. The first one alone below has been viewed a total of 9,705,189 on YouTube. The second and third aren't that far behind. Yes, the videos were corporate-sponsored, by Stride Gum, but I still appreciate the sentiment of each.

Check out Matt’s official site for more about him, like that fact that he has a Darwinian Tubercle in one ear.

'Pink Panther 2' - Minus Beyoncé

As if the first one wasn't bad enough, they're giving us a second one.

I like Steven Martin most of the time. Shopgirl was a quiet, quaint, absorbing little film, and he's restrained performance in it was unlike much of anything he'd done before. But Peter Sellers he is not! This is one franchise that should have been left untouched.

Those who haven't seen the Peter Sellers originals should make every effort to do so. It's Sellers at his peak, right after Lolitaand immediately preceding Dr. Strangelove (both directed by another master, Stanley Kubrick). You can check out the 3 film set by clicking HERE.

The Steve Martin sequel hits theaters in February 2009. Beyoncé wisely sat this one out.

Teaser trailer below...

Early Preview Of 'Miracle At St Anna'

On Thursday at the ongoing Silverdocs Film Festival taking place in Silver Spring, Md, where he received the festival's Charles Guggenheim award, according to this dispatch article I read over at IndieWire.com, Spike showed an "extended reel" of footage from his upcoming WWII epic, Miracle At St Anna. The article doesn't say how long the reel was, but apparently there was enough for the writer to come up with a brief review of the film, which follows below. It doesn't reveal much we don't already know, but you can definitely feel the writer's excitement for the film.

From IndieWire:

"The relationship of editing to theme bleeds into Lee's narratives as well, a factor demonstrated by the extended clip reel from his upcoming World War II drama "Miracle at St. Anna," which focuses on African American soldiers in Tuscany around the time of the Sant'Anna di Stazzema massacre in 1944. The film opens decades later, when one of the former fighters commits a public murder and the public investigation generates widespread chaos. Ten years after "Saving Private Ryan" revitalized the commercial war movie, Lee appears to have recontextualized the genre from his distinctive vantage point: Suddenly, fleeting nondiegetic inserts give way to a full-on flashback to the war, revealing the details of the grunts' experiences. The preview proved that the film moves fast -- not only in terms of action on the battlefield (of which there's plenty), but tonally as well. One moment, guns erupt across sprawling planes and shouts fill the air; then, a scene of quiet intimacy and unexpected humor, when one of the black soldiers discovers a young Italian boy in an abandoned home. The boy's reaction to his visitor: "A chocolate giant." The story comes from James McBride's novel, but there's no doubt that "Miracle at St. Anna" is a Spike Lee Joint."

'Ballast' Filmmaker Backs Out Of IFC Distribution Deal!

This was a bold move...

Back in February, I reported that Sundance darling, Ballast, the Mississippi Delta drama that follows a family shattered by suicide, was picked up for distribution by IFC Films, in a six-figure deal plus gross backend participation.

Now, I just read that writer/director Lance Hammer has backed out of the deal with IFC to instead take an apparently smaller offer from the lesser known Strand Releasing distribution company.

Why? Hammer says that he "wasn't dissatisfied with IFC but wanted to retain control of his movie."

How often does that happen? A filmmaker turning down a lot of money to take a lot less money so that he/she can maintain control of his/her work... rarely, in my experience.

IFC's statement in response was, "Obviously, we're disappointed, but how can we not support him if he tries to take control of this himself... We wanted the movie... we think that we would have done really well with it. It's the first time that's happened with us."

But Hammer seems to know the business well enough that he's willing to take the risk, stating, "The budget was big enough that it would be hard in the current model to see that money back... In the old days, when distributors gave a larger minimum guarantee, that would have been a totally different story. Nobody can afford to do that anymore."

Ahhhh... the business of cinema.

Strand Releasing plans release the film in New York in the fall, before expanding to other markets.

For those of you in the L.A. area, Ballast screens this weekend at the Los Angeles Film Festival, along with two other films I mentioned in previous posts below - Prince of Broadway and Medicine For Melancholy. I'm envious. I wish I was in L.A. right now. I'm sure each film will make its way to New York, and I'll get my chance to see them then. By the way, it's worth noting that Medicine For Melancholy, as I posted on Thursday, just got picked up by IFC Films for distribution. So, they lose one, and then gain one. Maybe IFC Films is becoming the go-to distribution company for black cinema :o)

Read the entire Ballast/IFC article HERE.

Remember When?

'Hancock' Reviews - Twist Revealed!


Warning: LOTS OF SPOILERS AHEAD, so proceed at your own risk.

Still here?


You sure?

Ok, you've been warned!

I just read a few reviews from a number of people who have seen test screenings of possibly the biggest movie this summer with the world's biggest star in Will Smith, Hancock, and the vast majority are negative. Some overwhelmingly so! You can read my spoiler-free review HERE, otherwise keep reading for more of the juicy stuff!

There's a major plot twist that happens about midway through the film, which you'll either hate, or simply go with. It's shifts the tone of the film considerably; but apparently, without it, the film would simply be traveling in circles. Not good!

The trailers are certainly misleading, because this is less an action movie and actually more of a love story - a love story between Will Smith's character (Hancock) and Charlize Theron's, with the super-hero bits operating more as background material.

The film really should have gone with the R-rated version, and included a lot more of the "mature" content than was apparently cut out of the film to ensure a PG13 rating to reel in the younger demographic.
I guess that explains the re-shoots (SEE my Hancock In Ratings Trouble? post from last month for more on that).

Ok, so here's the big Hancock twist revealed halfway through the film:

At this point, I think we all know what the one-sentence synopsis of the films is - a hard-living superhero (Will Smith) who has fallen out of favor with the public, falls for the wife (Charlize Theron) of the public relations professional (Jason Bateman) who's trying to repair the superhero's image.


The midway twist? Charlize's character is a superhero too!! But no one knows this - not Hancock, and not even her husband, Jason Bateman. She reveals her powers in a scene when she and Hancock are alone, and he tries to kiss her, when she suddenly picks him and throws him out the window of her house, sending him flying several hundred feet, before finally slamming into a car's windshield.

Wait, there's more!

Charlize's character later reveals that she and Hancock (Will) are descendants of Gods. She also reveals that they were once husband and wife! We also find out that they are each others respective kryptonites. The more time they spend together, the weaker and more mortal they become, so they need to stay apart. Apparently, she was at the movies with (Hancock) 80 years ago. They were on the road to mortality when Hancock saw a man getting mugged. Hancock intervened and got knocked in the head causing him to loose his memory, and Charlize's character decided to disappear from his life because the world needs one hero -- Hancock!


That's it - the end :o)

You can read one entire spoiler-filled review HERE at AICN. It pretty much runs through the entire film, so, again, read at your own peril. I should point out that it is a month old review, and this was from a test screening, meaning, some things could change before the film opens on July 1st, in 11 days. However, I don't think a major plotline like the "Charlize Theron as superheroine" bit will change.


Ya know, as I watched the trailers, before reading these reviews, I did wonder what the film was really about. The trailers and clips show him performing various super-heroic things, but not much more. I always knew that there was a love story in there, and I did also wonder why none of it is played up in any of the trailers. But I realized that the studio releasing it (Sony I believe) wants to make it seem as accessible as possible to as wide an audience as possible, so, it makes sense to silence that part of the story, and instead play up the action sequences. That's just the nature of the game, I suppose.


So, over all, nothing terribly special! I'd catch a matinee or wait for the DVD!