THE OBENSON REPORT

Covering Cinema From All Across The African Diaspora
Showing posts with label things that made me go hmm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label things that made me go hmm. Show all posts

THINGS THAT MADE ME GO HMM - Sundance Director Leaves For Tribeca



Some news with potentially long term ramifications that almost went unnoticed by me this morning.


Sundance festival president/director Geoffrey Gilmore has left his long-time home to become chief creative officer of Tribeca Enterprises, the company that operates the Tribeca Film Festival.

Gilmore had a 19-year career at Sundance that culminated in his role as director of the Sundance Film Festival.

Tribeca Enterprises is the New York-based media firm founded by Travis Bickle himself, Monsieur Robert De Niro. It operates Tribeca Film Festival International, amongst other enterprises; although the festival is probably its most famous offering.

Gilmore said he sees an opportunity for Tribeca Enterprises "to develop a film organization that can create a new paradigm for the future."

So, what might all this mean? Maybe nothing; but I can't help speculating, given all the recent articles I've read, and discussions I've heard in the last 2 years about Sundance's waning influence, thanks in part to the digital revolution we've experienced in recent years, during much of Gilmore's tenure as director of the festival.

Might he be hoping to replicate the success he had at Sundance, at Tribeca, a festival that has so far failed to meet the expectations of its creators, the locals, and the industry it serves (which would explain their move to bring in a man with Gilmore's rep and experience)?

They say every empire eventually falls, only to be replaced by a new one. Might Tribeca be trying to put itself on that path - to emerge as Sundance's replacement, when that particular empire meets its eventual demise?


I don't know! But I find it all rather interesting :o)


via THR

THINGS THAT MADE ME GO HMMM - Cartoon Voices



I just watched the trailer for an upcoming stylized CGI-animated, feature-length film produced by Tim Burton called
9.

In the film, Elijah Wood, John C. Reilly, Jennifer Connelly, Crispin Glover, Martin Landau, and Christopher Plummer provide voices for each of the animated characters, and I'm sure were payed handsomely for their efforts.

Rightfully so!


However, I wonder if animated studio features like 9, and all those that have come before it (all the Shrek movies, Toy Story, The Incredibles, Ice Age, Monsters Inc, and the vast cauldron of others) would have been any less successful if the voices behind each character in each movie, were provided by non-stars... "no-list" actors that could really use the work and the money.

They say that the rich get richer, and there's certainly more than enough proof to support that statement; but the studios could opt to reverse that trend by giving an unknown the opportunity to perform and earn a paycheck in the process, instead of calling on established celebrities.

These are often family-friendly films, aimed at boys and girls under the age of 16, who probably could care less whose voice was behind each character in each film.

I doubt adults care either. I've seen a few of these films, and the names listed in the "voiced by" section of the credits aren't the attraction. The style of animation, and the story are.

Who really cares if Eddie Murphy provided the voice for Donkey in the Shrek movies, or if Tom Hanks was the voice behind Woody in the Toy Story series - all immensely successful films that I genuinely believe would have been just as successful if Joe Schmoe, struggling Los Angeles-based actor, was given the opportunity to flex his vocal talents.

So, I say, come on Hollywood - give the little guy a break for once. I seriously doubt that it'll hurt your bottomline. Jennifer Connelly doesn't necessarily need the work, nor the money; next time, give the job (and the paycheck) to Jane Schmoe, struggling New York actress. I'm sure she'd be incredibly grateful, and would give you one heck of a vocal performance!

In the meantime, here's the trailer for 9, a film that's on my 2009 "To-See" list. From the little dialogue heard in the 2-minute teaser, see if you can tell who's voice is whose, or whether you even really care.

PRINT - Welcome To Nigeriatown... In China



We know a lot about the recent Chinese "invasion" of African countries, in what has effectively been described by many as 21st century colonization of the continent; but we've heard very little of the story from the other side - the Africans who have been exported to China, as part of this economic exchange agreement between the continent and the Asian country.


The current issue of The New Yorker contains an article about the economic, social, and religious lives of African merchants living in China, in what some Nigerians there are calling Nigeriatown, AKA Chocolate City.

This is all very interesting to me, and worth paying attention to, on all fronts. Globalization is the name of the game; but, who's really benefiting in this arrangement? Answers vary depending on who you ask.

Time will answer that question.

One thing is certain - given the inevitable couplings occurring between Nigerian men and Chinese women in China, as mentioned in the New Yorker piece, China's overall complexion is going to gradually change in years to come. The shift will sit comfortably amongst all the other "post-racial," "Obama effect" hysteria we've been hearing about since the inauguration last month - even though this one is years older than Obama's campaign.

It would make for an interesting, revealing film - the life of an African man/woman/child in Guangzhou.

Might we see Nollywood movies infiltrate Chinese culture, and vice-versa, one influencing the other?

Click the image below to listen to and view New Yorker writer, Evan Osnos, narrate a 3 1/2-minute audio slide show summarizing the piece.




via NEW YORKER

THINGS THAT MADE ME GO HMM - Spike Lee Directing Wesley Snipes In James Brown Biopic



I don't know how I missed this. I had no idea this was happening, but apparently, it's been in the works for a couple of years, since James Brown's death on Christmas Day, 2006!


Or maybe I knew, but it just floated further away from my mind for one reason or another. I even searched my blog to see if I had posted something about it previously, but found no such thing.

I must be slipping... or sleeping.

Anyway... I just read that Spike Lee and Paramount have a James Brown biopic in the works, which will star Wesley Snipes, as the godfather of soul. The project is said to have come together shortly after Brown died in 2006 of congested heart failure.

Wow! Wesley as J.B.? If there's one man/woman whom I think will make for a challenging project for any actor/actress, James Brown would be that person. His mannerisms, his speech, his onstage persona, all that energy, and flamboyancy. It's one of those performances that could fail as unintended comedy, if not handled with skill.

Sure, James Brown's public personality was worthy of an intended laugh, or two, or three, but he had a depth that balanced him out. It's evident in his music alone.

I fear a caricature of the man; I haven't seen Wesley in anything this demanding, and with "hit/miss" Spike at the helm, I'm a little skeptical.

BUT, I'm hopeful, and will keep my eyes and ears open for any information on this.

According to MTV News, Snipes will not be doing any real singing of James Browns songs. He'll be lip-syncing.

“We’re doing it together – it’s going to happen,” Lee told MTV News in an exclusive interview at the Sundance Film Festival this week. The Oscar nominated director of “Do the Right Thing” and “Inside Man” lavished praise on Snipes. “He’s my man,” Lee said; but when it comes to the vocals on Brown’s classic tracks like “I Got You (I Feel Good)” and “Get Up Offa That Thing,” expect to hear the authentic voice of James Brown being dubbed in.

“I want to hear James Brown’s voice,” the director said. “That’s just my personal taste.”

That's probably a smart decision on Spike's part.

I have no idea when the film starts shooting, or when it will be released. It doesn't even have an IMDB page. What the hell? Is this an early April Fool's prank?

Good to see Wesley returning to center-stage with probably his most challenging effort to date. Might we be talking about "award-winning actor" Wesley Snipes some time in the near future, following in the footsteps of Mickey Rourke?

Stay tuned...

via MTV MOVIES

THINGS THAT MADE ME GO HMM - 50 Cent To Direct And More...

Boasting about his business empire at the Sundance Film Festival, Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson talked to Reuters specifically about his plans for cinematic infamy.

Under his newly-formed Cheetah Vision film production company, 50 claims to have already bought eight scripts.

Among the first to be produced will be something called The Dance, which will star himself and Nicolas Cage.

In the film, Cage will play the founder of a boxing program, and 50 will play a fighter who goes to state prison.

"They are all different types of movies that I bought the rights to, and we're developing projects. You will see different things from me in the future," he said.

Mr Cent also plans to make his directorial debut this year on a feature-length film titled, Before I Self Destruct, - a film he says he will give away for free with his next album of the same name, which is due to be released in February/March.

IMDB describes the film as, "A coming of age story about an inner-city youth raised by a hardworking single mother who is shot to death, leaving the youth to take up a life of crime in order to support his younger brother."

50 also stars in the film, by the way.


He's certainly becoming a big screen fixture.

Later this year, he will be seen in
Streets of Blood with Val Kilmer and Sharon Stone, and he is also due to start filming 13 with Mickey Rourke - a remake of a 2006 French film of the same name, which I saw and dug, despite its morbidity! A decent first effort for Géla Babluani, the Georgian-French filmmaker of the original who will also write and direct the remake. Here's its trailer... I'm not sure who will be playing what:




via LATINOREVIEW

The "Benjamin Button" Poster That Never Was



I was just over at SlashFilm and saw the image above.

Apparently, according to SlashFilm, for unexplained reasons, Paramount Pictures/David Fincher chose not to use this piece of promotional art (found in the studio’s Oscar advertising campaign) as part of the film’s theatrical marketing. Now, inquiring minds want to know why.

I actually like it... it's certainly much more striking than any of the other images they decided to use instead. But, maybe it's too cryptic, especially for those not familiar with the story, or that Taraji P. Henson plays a major role in it.

Recognizable faces sell tickets, so, of course we'd expect to find Brad Pitt's mug on every marketing item, as well as Cate Blanchett's. But this would have been an interesting sight on some gigantic billboard around mid-town Manhattan! No titles, no names, no taglines - just the image, and maybe the release date at the bottom somewhere.

via SLASHFILM
Hmmm

Bollywood, Starring Will Smith

WILL
Interesting piece from Variety Magazine I thought worth sharing.

It's no secret to anyone that Will Smith is an international superstar; here's a very good reason why:


Hollywood isn't a big deal in India, but Will Smith is. While Hollywood movies must make do with a market share of 5%-10% in a subcontinent dominated by Bollywood and other local varieties of cinema, Smith once again confounds expectations.

He helped launch Sony's Pix channel in India, has done guest turns on talent competition show "Indian Idol" and even has a production deal with UTV, one of India's leading studios.

According to previous accounts, Smith's interest in India came after release plans for the superstar's date-doctor pic "Hitch" were rejected by Chinese authorities. Angry at being locked out of such a growth market, the proactive Smith turned to Sony... who instead of suggesting a solution to the China problem, said they could be more helpful in India, a much more open market.

A month or two later, Smith and Overbrook partner James Lassiter took a five-day trip to India, where they met execs, directors and giants of the Indian scene, including superstar Amitabh Bachchan, and visited the Taj Mahal.

"On his first trip to India, not only did Will have a great time and meet a lot of interesting people, but I believe he really did fall in love with India -- the warmth of the people and the interaction and the buzz of the city and the creative energy of the people of the film world," says UTV topper Ronnie Screwvala.

"I really feel there is a marriage to be made between Hollywood and Bollywood," Smith said at the time, and he joked that he would like to be called "the Big W," an echo of Bachchan's nickname "the Big B."

Smith's global appeal may have much to do both with his interest in the world beyond the U.S. shores and his willingness to engage in a hands-on fashion.

"It's been said, 'Why sell something to 10 people when you can sell it to 10 million people?' You have to have a global perspective," Smith told the New York Times.

He is critical of stars who don't like to travel abroad in support of their movies, and he uses each of his Hollywood tentpoles to target a particular country for intense promotion work - and expansion of his inclusive, arms-wide-open brand.

[...]

Screwvala... saw an opportunity to build something, and he quickly followed up with meetings in L.A. and Gotham. That turned into a $30 million deal for UTV and Overbrook to co-produce movies that Sony would distribute.

Plan is to make a live-action film in the region of $10 million and an animated pic costing $20 million. Deal sees UTV provide coin up to a specified sum, beyond which Overbrook has to raise the money. Emphasis is on Smith and Lassiter to develop a script and hire the cast.

"We struck a chord, and it was clearly keeping in mind an Asia and India slant," says Screwvala...

[...]

Since that first trip to India 2½ years ago, Smith and Lassiter have returned regularly, visiting more stars, execs and locations. Danny Boyle reports that Smith visited him twice while the Brit helmer was lensing India-set "Slumdog Millionaire."

"There's going to be a massive coming together of Bollywood and Hollywood. It'll only take one person to bring them together, and it'll be huge," Boyle told the Indian press. The Big W could be the man for the job.
As Johnny Caspar laments in Miller's Crossing, "Running things, it ain't all gravy."

I concur!

I had no idea he's made appearances
on Indian television (Indian Idol) - I wonder if there are any clips of this floating around the web. Time to do some digging.

I wonder if any of these Will Smith/Bollywood flicks will reach American screens...


via VARIETY
WILL

Aaliyah Bio-Pic In The Works?

BIO


According to Canada's National Post, Ottawa-born R&B singer Keshia Chante, 20, will reportedly be playing late singer and actress Aaliyah, in a biopic of the singer and actress' life.


The film is expected to be released in the new year.

I didn't realize an Aaliyah biopic was in the works; but, I guess if we're getting a Notorious B.I.G. biopic, then why not one for Aaliyah as well? Expect a Tupac biopic shortly. Although, I'm surprised one hasn't already been made. There have been a few documentaries... notably the Academy Award-nominated Tupac: Resurrection, released in 2003.

Clearly there's interest from studios in feature films about some of our young performers from the so-called hip hop generation - as we've seen over the past decade or so... Eminem's 8 Mile, 50 Cent's Get Rich or Die Trying, Biggie's Notorious in theatres next month, Aaliyah's biopic, and whoever else I may be forgetting.

By comparison, it took 27 long years before a big screen telling of Malcolm X's story was produced and distributed; and as we all know, Spike faced some budget battles with Warner Bros, and had to enlist the financial assistant of his contemporaries in order to complete the picture, including the likes of Oprah Winfrey, Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, Janet Jackson, Prince, and Bill Cosby.


via AMPERSAND

Blackbird - The Web Browser For Black People



It's called Blackbird, and is described by its creators as "the web browser for the African American community," supposedly making it easier for African Americans to discover relevant content on the web, and to interact with other members of the African American community, online, by sharing stories, news, comments, videos, and more...

The browser displays a pre-set news ticker on top, pulling in relevant news content from Google News that might be of interest to African-Americans, and features a section with video content from online TV sites like UptownLiveTV, NSNewsTV, DigitalSoulTV and ComedyBanksTV.

Other than that, there’s a lot of integration with the most popular social networks (Facebook, etc), something called a "Black Search," preset "Black Bookmarks," and more.

There’s also a "Give Back" program that streamlines donations to a number of non-profit organizations (Blackbird intends to donate 10% of its 2009 revenue to these partners as well).

It's a free download, by the way, paid for with lots of targeted advertising - no surprise there.

So, the question begging to be asked is, do we really need a "Black web browser?"

I'm content with Firefox, especially with all the customization tools that are already built into it, as are in most recent versions of all the popular browser applications.

But kudos to the team (all African American engineers) for taken on the endeavor, and seeing it all the way to fruition; however, I just don't think it's warranted. I understand niche products and marketing, but this one seems completely unnecessary.

Why not just create a competing browser, as opposed to a "Black browser?"

Although, I suppose one could ask that question about other ideas - for example, why not just create a film, as opposed to a "black film?" Or why not just create a blog or podcast dedicated to film in general, as opposed to a blog/podcast dedicated to "black film?"

Questions... questions...

There's a difference... I can't imagine how exactly this "black browser" will improve on my web surfing experience, enough to make me switch from the browser I currently use. Finding the content I need (whether it's "black content") has never really been a problem for me; and, as I said above, today's browsers come with enough customizable features that make it quite easy for me to navigate the world wide web, and connect with whatever my wants and desires are.

It'll have to provide me with some obvious elevated experience, or some advantage over its competitors, to make me want to consider using it. And, from everything I've read about it, and taking my limited experience with it into consideration, there's absolutely nothing of the sort.

In addition, the timing of it is all wrong, with so many browsers already crowding the marketplace. It's several years too late, I think, and would have had a much better shot at success if it was built 5 years ago.

No immediate word on how much interest there is in the Blackbird browser. It's been in existence for about 3 weeks, in beta, so you can check it out for yourself here: BLACKBIRD.

And let me know what you think about it.
HMMM

"Whopper Virgins" - Good Friday Morning!

The story goes... Burger King's new controversial ad campaign dubbed "Whopper Virgins," spotlights people in remote areas of the world who have never heard of, nor eaten hamburgers before.

They hired director Stacy Peralta (Dogtown and Z-Boys) to document what became a 20,000 mile international journey to find these so-called "Whopper virgins" to perform “the world’s purest taste test."

Thirteen planes, two dog sleds and one helicopter later, they produced a short documentary, advertising their journey, which you can watch below.

Here's to exporting America's obesity problem one Whopper at a time.

Anyone else bothered by this?


Should We Pay Black Kids To Learn?

HMMM


Not specifically about black cinema, but still somewhat related...

Carmen Dixon over at the Black Voices blog just posted an entry about a controversial new experiment, helmed by Harvard professor Roland Fryer, that "pays black and other disadvantaged and underachieving school kids for good grades and staying in school."

She writes:

It's a controversial approach. Many ask why kids should be paid for something they are required to do?

On the other hand, kids in affluent homes are routinely paid allowances and given graduation trips of cars, trips and/or cash as rewards for acknowledgment of jobs well done. Fryer is simply determined to try anything to stem the out-of-control dropout rate and to close the achievement gap between black and white (and Asian) students.

Fryer's theory, to pay kids to do better in school, comes from many years of research and his own sense of desperation.

"The theory here is to try innovative things that will help children achieve," Fryer says. "In our urban centers, we're spending $12,000, $15,000 a kid, and we're not getting any results. So we must do something."

According to the post, the early reviews of this experiment appear positive, with some school officials and kids responding enthusiastically. For example, from the
Times Online:

The scheme is still in its first year, but previously skeptical teachers have already begun to report marked improvements in their children's attendance and attention.

"I have to say that my first reaction when I heard of this project was, 'I can't believe they are doing this'," said Sheila Richards, the principal of the Brooklyn school. "I'm old school – I worked hard for good grades and no one ever gave me money."

Yet Richards has seen a "very good" increase in her students' grades and is thrilled that many of them are choosing to open bank accounts to save their earnings. "It's more than just an incentive," she said. "It has taught them the value of saving."

And Washington, DC Schools Chancellor,
Michelle Rhee, advocates the program, stating:

The reality for so many of our kids is that there are a lot of incentives to do all the wrong things out on the street, and we believe that having positive incentives for doing the right thing is a good counter balance to that.

So, what do you think? As Carmen asks, should we pay kids to learn?

My thoughts? As I stated on the Black Voices blog...

Controversial indeed! As the saying goes... desperate times call for desperate measures.

However, this idea frightens me for a lot of reasons - notably, whether many of these kids will develop a false sense of entitlement as they age, expecting monetary reward for accomplishing mundane, everyday tasks.

I just can't quite fathom how this kind of commercialization of a child's education can be a good thing for both the child and the system of education in the long term.

What could this lead to? A hierarchy of payment incentives? Super-star students, like super-star athletes enjoying fatter "paychecks" than star students who aren't as "super" as the super-stars? Students eventually demanding more for their efforts? Parents deciding on which school to send their children to, based partly on the kinds of cash incentives each school gives their students?

And on... and on...

I'm all for encouraging children (and adults) to learn, especially those underachievers; but, surely, we can come up with a better solution than this?!? At least, I'd like to think so...
Hmmmm

A Referendum: More Sex Scenes For Black Male Stars?



This just hit me suddenly after reading a recent article in which Will Smith explains his lack of interest in onscreen love scenes.


2 of our biggest African American male celebrity actors have, whether currently, or previously, acknowledged an aversion to performing in love scenes on camera. First, Denzel Washington did so some years ago (I'll have to look for a quote online), with his reasons seemingly being to honor his wife, or something to that effect. And now Will Smith - whom I only just realized hasn't really done any love scenes. Sure, he's had a few fleeting flirtatious moments with his female co-stars - whenever he does have a comparable one - and he's exposed his torso from time to time... but he hasn't done much else!

What's up with that fellas?

Not that I'm exactly dying to see either of them in a no-holds-barred romp on screen, but, when you compare them with their Caucasian counterparts - those white male superstars that dominate our screens (Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise, Mel Gibson, George Clooney, et al) - Denzel and Will are severely lacking!

I think there's something at work (and at play) here that needs to be brought to light - specifically, the subjugation of black male sexuality in American mainstream media. There's no reason why 2 of our most prominent African American actors - both with global appeal - rarely have love interests in their movies, or express themselves sexually on screen, especially when one considers that their Caucasian pals seem to be falling into bed with some damsel (in distress or not) on screen, more often than they don't.

Granted, both men claim full responsibility for their lack of onscreen sexuality, giving their own individual reasons; however, I simply can't help but feel that there might be something - some idea, or some person or people, of greater influence partly responsible here.

I think the longer each man holds out, the more awkward-looking any love scenes they eventually do will be, simply because, we haven't become accustomed to seeing them in that manner, and might actually giggle more than gasp in those instances.

Then again, I suppose Will Smith has never really positioned himself as the proverbial "sex symbol." He's played it safe for the most part, and I think that's one reason for his global appeal.

Denzel Washington on the otherhand was at one time considered a sex symbol, and I think he still is thought of in that way, but I could be wrong.


His reason for shying away from sex scenes, from what I gather out of all the material I've read about him, are mostly an expressed discomfort with them, but also his belief that they, in some way, dishonor his wife.

I just read an article in which Will Smith gives reasons why he is rarely involved in a sex scene on screen, telling reporters last Friday while promoting his new film, Seven Pounds,

My grandmother was really firm about how men are supposed to treat women... So for me, my worst nightmare is for an actress to... feel like I'm taking this opportunity to get a little quickie feel – you know, some legal cheating going on! I just need, specifically women, to feel comfortable around me... I just don't want to feel like I'm that dude.

Apparently, in Seven Pounds, Smith has an intimate moment with co-star Rosario Dawson, one which he expressed discomfort with; that is until his wife, Jada, gave him the green light to go for it, stating,

Jada said, 'Listen, I know you're uncomfortable, but you better not embarrass me... She said, 'When you do that love scene, you better show 'em what you're working with!'

HA!

So, one thing that's become clear to me after all this is that the wives of both men are of heavy influence on their decisions! Whoulda thunk it?

Come on fellas! Give the people what they want! Not only do we need to see more black faces on screen, we also could do with more expressions of "black sexuality" within the medium - especially in the mainstream.

SEXUALITY

Get Out Of My Head!

It's only a matter of time before we're all linked neurologically, like The Borg; a collective consciousness. We'll be able to hear each others thoughts, and effectively communicate telepathically... we won't be able to run or hide from anyone, or any entity, and data will be transmitted en masse, or ideas will be disseminated on a mass scale, and even behavioral drugs: "OBEY!" "DESTROY!" "KILL!" "SLEEP!" What's scarily humorous about news like this is that literature and film have long predicted society's development of these kinds of questionable ideas, and their potential ramifications, both short and long term, good and bad... from HG Wells, to Aldous Huxley, and their present-day spawn...

Check out this article from Time Magazine:

Soldiers barking orders at each other is so 20th Century. That's why the U.S. Army has just awarded a $4 million contract to begin developing "thought helmets" that would harness silent brain waves for secure communication among troops... Ultimately, the Army hopes the project will "lead to direct mental control of military systems by thought alone"... The Army's initial goal is to capture those brain waves with incredibly sophisticated software that then translates the waves into audible radio messages for other troops in the field... "Having a soldier gain the ability to communicate without any overt movement would be invaluable both in the battlefield as well as in combat casualty care," the Army said in last year's contract solicitation... "It would provide a revolutionary technology for silent communication and orientation that is inherently immune to external environmental sound and light"... And don't overlook potential civilian benefits.

Read it all here: MIND CONTROL

While You Were Sleeping...

A death and a birth... While Wall Street and 25,000+ employees were abuzz over Lehman Brothers' unexpected tumble (the death of a revered institution), Bank of America (BOA) was busy devouring Merrill Lynch, a transaction that when complete will make BOA the largest banking institution in America, according to Slate, with arms in nearly every aspect of the financial industry (the birth of a new behemoth).

It will be able to provide a bank account to save your money in, a mortgage to spend it on, a credit card to go into debt with (a debt you'll owe to them), and now, with the addition of Merrill, advice about how to invest it, combining consumer and investment banking in a way that few other financial institutions manage. It adds Merrill’s $966 billion in assets to its own already impressive $1.7 trillion!

The government refused to bail Lehman Brothers out; however, new reports state that floundering insurance giant AIG won't be as unlucky, as Uncle Sam intends to lend a hand in the form of a financial lifeline. AIG is significantly larger than Lehman Brothers, so it's understandable.

The question as one writer suggests is whether BOA will now become too big to succeed, and if, in another dozen years or less, we'll be talking about another death and another birth, as BOA falters under its own weight, and thousands of men and women, and in turn, the economy, suffer for it, as the government struggles with the decision to either let the giant fall, or save it from collapse, while the next behemoth rises to take its place, repeating the cycle.

As I've said previously on this blog, I'm all for the free market that capitalism provides us, and I'm not endorsing blanket government regulation of industry, but clearly there's a problem here that needs to be evaluated and a solution eventually reached. Surely there's a happy medium. As BOA becomes even larger, and dominant, a company with almost 300,000 employees, and $3 trillion in assets (much of it being money belonging to the customers its several factions serve), I would expect that government officials would be concerned that a repeat of what we've seen in recent weeks, and even over the last several decades, will indeed occur, with even more devastating economic consequences, warranting an intervention once again.

How about taking a cue from the now-infamous Bush Doctrine and applying it locally - preemptive measures, with the difference being strictly economic, not military? It might mean punishing an entire industry for the sins of a few, but maybe that's not such a bad idea. It'll be like a parent holding all of his/her children accountable when one of them fucks up, especially if the others looked the other way as the problem child was fucking up. Every child gets a smack on the wrist, regardless of contribution, which will then force the "innocent" ones to not only ensure that they behave as expected, but also to make sure that the child who fucked up behaves just as well, or do whatever they can to isolate him/her into obscurity!

By the way, it's worth noting that both Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch are among the biggest donors to the presidential campaigns of both Barack Obama and John McCain, with Lehman donating more than $370,000 to Obama's camp, and Merrill Lynch giving close to $300,000 to McCain's. Interestingly, both candidates agree, calling for tougher regulation of financial institutions!

Italian Villas For Sale - Two Dollars Each!

Here's your chance to own a piece of one of the so-called most romantic places in the world, Italy - specifically a small Sicilian town called Salemi. And it'll only cost you 1 Euro, or about $2. Of course, there's a small catch; although, given the current state of the housing market here in the USA, it might not seem unnattractive!

Read on...

From Newsweek:



An earthquake devastated the Sicilian village of Salemi in 1968, killing 200 people and reducing thousands of buildings to rubble. Down the hill, a faceless modern city sprung up in the village's place, but the historical center has been a ghost town ever since. Except for a few dozen habitable villas, the ruins are frozen in time: tattered curtains hang on broken windows and rusty table legs protrude from heaps of rubble.

Now Salemi is taking an unusual step to reincarnate the old town: it is giving the dilapidated villas away. The city's new celebrity mayor, Vittorio Sgarbi, a former national deputy culture minister and an avid art critic and colorful television personality, is offering 3,000 of the villas for the bargain-basement price of €1 a piece. The catch? The new owners have two years to renovate, staying true to each building's original characteristics and, when possible, using the area's local artisans, masons and builders.

The rest of the story here: 2 BUCKS VILLA

Happy Birthday Google! For Your Next Trick...

It wasn't publicized much outside of techie circles - at least, I didn't see much coverage of it - so I'm spreading the news. 

Google turned 10 years old on Sunday, the 7th! 

Talk about a meteoric rise to power and fortune, with 20,000 employees worldwide, and a $150 billion market capitalization (larger than stalwarts like Ford Motors, McDonald's, Coca Cola and PepsiCo - companies that have been around for decades... or as long as a century for both Ford and Coca Cola).

Both founders are multi-billionnaires, and it's certainly created a wealth of millionnaires. 

It's given us the most popular search engine currently (which I use for 100% of my searches), one of the most popular email portals in GMail (I have an account), and most recently, they've presented us with their own take on the browser, called Chrome, which I'm actually using as I type up this post on another one of their offerings called Blogger! 

So, it's obvious that I'm a slave to Google. God knows how much information they have about me stored on their data servers - after all, they know my browsing habits thanks to the searches I make with their search engine, they have all my GMail emails, and since I use Adsense, their web-based advertising program, they also have my social security number, full address, phone number, and even bank account information, amongst other things.

It's amazing how comfortable a lot of us have become with Google, a seemingly harmless, inventive, workman-like company with a kind of blue collar ethos, that we are willing to turn over our life specifics, even the most sensitive of data, to one company, allowing them to wield quite a bit of power over us. I'm certainly one of those people :o) 

And later on this year, they'll be invading our cell phones too!

So, I guess it should come as no surprise that the Justice Department has its eye on Google, specifically its search deal with that other online behemoth, Yahoo. As we saw with the Justice Department's anti-trust case against Microsoft in the 90s, there's obviously some concern about Google's reach and power, and rightfully so, I suppose. 

Google’s growing dominance is raising both privacy and anti-trust concerns. The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that the Department of Justice is considering taking antitrust action against Google in relation to its proposed search advertising deal with Yahoo, which could be the beginning of other similar inquiries into the company's practices, which I'm sure they'd happily avoid.

This is certainly something to keep an eye on, especially in light of the ongoing Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac intervention.

So, once again... Happy 10th Birthday Google! The above news of the Justice Department's potential actions hasn't been much of a birthday present, I'm sure. But somehow, I think they'll survive any attacks.

So Much For Little Girls And Their Dolls...

Nothing brings a father and daughter together like the timed dismantling and reassembling of an AR-15 automatic rifle... YEAH! The NRA must love this!


Say Goodbye To Amsterdam's Red-Light District?

I've never been to Amsterdam, so its Red-Light District remains nothing but a fantasy :o) - one of those places I only know about from others who have been there, or read about in various trade mags.

And thanks to the below article, I might never experience the district as it currently exists! Boo-hoo...


Reading it, the first thing I thought of was the clean-up of Times Square here in New York City, during the early to mid-1990s - an area that was previously thought of as a cesspool, overrun with crime and home to sex shops and peep shows - essentially, New York's on Red-Light District! Now you can't walk 1 inch without hitting a freaking tourist, looking for Madame Tussauds Wax Museum or the MTV studios, amongst several other attractions.


So, might one of the more liberal democracies in the world be getting a tad more conservative? Is this the beginning of a eventual shift in policy, despite that fact the the district is one of Amsterdam's main tourist attractions?

From Time Magazine Online
:


For Maurits Van Brunschot, the breaking point came nearly 21 years after he first settled amid the cobblestone alleyways of De Wallen, Amsterdam's red-light district. Van Brunschot began taking his infant daughter to day care. The neighborhood's public nursery was squeezed between two brothels, where nearly naked women in the windows beckon adult passersby. "Can you imagine this is what she sees every day?" says Van Brunschot, a food-company executive.

That question is perhaps too rarely posed by the millions of people who visit Amsterdam each year. For them, the city's liberal laws and attitudes offer a stark contrast to the heavy policing of sex and drugs elsewhere in Europe and in the U.S., and make this tiny neighborhood one of Amsterdam's most intriguing attractions. "Often people go to the museums and then to the red-light district," says the city's mayor, Job Cohen, sitting in his office with a sweeping view of the Ij River. "It is part of the image of tolerant Amsterdam."

Until now, that is. In a break with Amsterdam's "anything goes" attitude, Cohen and city officials have vowed to finally crack down on what they say are extensive criminal networks operating in the neighborhood.

The rest here:
AMSTERDAM CLEANS UP

The Invisible Human

Finally, I'll be able to sneak into the women's locker room at my local gym, undetected :o)

But seriously, how scary would the world be if these things eventually came to full fruition and grew to become as ubiquitous as iPods? The world is full of immoral and unethical people, and you can guarantee that someone, or some people will utilize the technology for selfish evil than good; my hypothetical ladies locker room perversions will pale in comparison, and will seem like child's play!


UK's Independent says that so-called "Invisibility cloaks" are set to become a reality. Read what they printed today here: Tomorrow's world today: How far are we from the invisibility cloak?.

Cher As Catwoman In Next Batman Movie?

I'm sure your immediate response was very similar to mine - HUH???? April Fools' day was almost 5 months ago!

Alas, it just might come to fruition, and might even make sense, once you get the rest of the story.


According to the UK Telegraph, "the 62-year-old singer and actress is reported to be in talks to play Catwoman opposite Christian Bale in the third Batman film from British director Christopher Nolan."

The article quotes a studio executive as saying that Cher is Nolan's first choice to play Catwoman. "He wants to her to portray her like a vamp in her twilight years... the absolute opposite of Michelle Pfeiffer and Halle Berry's purring creations."

So, essentially, Catwoman post her active, leotard wearing, whip lashing days? Sounds intriguing actually, but doesn't that stray from the established characterization of Catwoman in all the comic books and previous cartoons and movies? She has always been portrayed as parallel to Batman, within his age group, evolving as he evolved, much like the Joker, and has even been somewhat of a love interest. If the Telegraph's report is accurate, new rules would have to be developed regarding her character's career, motivations and relationship to Batman, as well as her alter ego's (Selina Kyle's) relationship to Batman's alter ego, Bruce Wayne. Maybe she'll be something like a cougar!! :o)


Regardless, anything would be better than the Catwoman Halle Berry gave us a few years ago. We need something to erase that vision from memory. Might it come in the form of Cher? I haven't seen much of her lately, but she's always been one to maintain near-perfect physical form, so I'm sure that's still the case, even at 62, and donning some black tights and high heels, brandishing a whip, might actually look just fine on her! Her last prominent role was in 1999's Tea With Mussolini. She's done some TV work since then, but for the most part, she's been invisible.

Thoughts?

SOURCE